Yeo Law Chambers

Legal Articles

Employee Termination: Giving Notice is Sufficient?

Question:

.

“Hi Mr. Yeo, my business has been facing significant challenges lately, and I find it necessary to terminate the contracts with some of my employees. For this, I have checked the terms of my company’s employment contracts (signed with them), and it appears that either party can initiate the termination of the employment relationship by providing one month’s notice in writing.

.

Hence, I would like to inquire whether I can just simply give them one month’s written notice to terminate their employment. As I am very concerned about the possibility of my employees’ lodging complaints against me with the Labour Department. I would greatly appreciate your advice and guidance on proceeding with this matter. Thanks! “

.

Answer:

.

1.     In Malaysia, the employment relationship between employers and employees is governed by two primary legislations: the Employment Act 1955 and the Industrial Relations Act 1967. These acts provide the legal framework for various employment-related matters, including termination procedures, rights, and obligations of both employers and employees.

.

2.     Unlike the employment concept in the United States, where employers and employees can generally terminate their relationship “at will“, Malaysia’s labour laws place significant emphasis on safeguarding the rights of employees.

.

3.     In Malaysia, the termination of employees’ contracts requires employers to provide “just cause and excuse” for the dismissal. This principle was affirmed by the Court of Appeal in the landmark case of Hong Leong Equipment Sdn. Bhd. v Liew Fook Chuan and Anor [1996] 1 MLJ 481. In this case, the court recognized that the employment tenure of employees should be protected similarly to property rights unless there are valid and justifiable grounds for termination:

.

The legislature has willed that the relationship of employer and workman as resting on a mere consensual basis that is capable of termination by the employer at will with the meagre consequence of paying the hapless workman a paltry sum as damages should be altered in favour of the workman. It has accordingly provided for security of tenure and equated the right to be engaged in gainful employment to a proprietary right which may not be forfeited save, and except, for just cause or excuse

.

4.     In other words, in Malaysia, the termination of employment contracts goes beyond the requirement of providing sufficient notice. Employers are obligated to provide just cause and excuse when terminating the employment of their employees as well.

.

5.     It is pertinent to note that the same legal requirement of just cause and excuse does not apply when employees themselves wish to terminate their employment. In such cases, the employment concept aligns more closely with the “at-will” principle commonly seen in the United States. As long as employees provide sufficient notice as per the terms outlined in their employment contract or agreement with the employers, their resignation is considered sufficient and legally compliant.

.

6.     What constitutes “just cause and reason” for termination is not explicitly defined in the Employment Act 1955 or the Industrial Relations Act 1967 in Malaysia. However, based on established case law, the courts generally consider several factors to determine if just cause and reason exist for termination.

.

7.     These factors typically include the initial reasons for hiring the employee, the responsibilities outlined in the employment contract, and whether the actions or behaviour of either party violate commonly accepted practices to the extent that it becomes impossible for the employer to continue the employment relationship. It is important to note that the evaluation of just cause and reason is determined on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances and facts surrounding each situation.

.

8.     Therefore, when it comes to terminating an employee, it is generally required to have a justifiable reason, typically rooted in the employee’s misconduct. According to the case of Goon Kwee Phoy v. J&P Coats (M) Bhd, it is crucial that the employer must clearly state the reasons for dismissal/ just cause and excuse in the termination letter. The employer cannot add other reason(s) after the employee lodged a complaint, and the Court will not consider these ‘new grounds for dismissal’.

.

9.     In situations where an employee has not committed any wrongdoing, but the employer intends to terminate the employment relationship due to financial constraints or other business-related reasons, there are specific mechanisms available in Malaysia. The employer can opt for a voluntary separation scheme (VSS) or a mandatory separation scheme (retrenchment) to manage the termination process.

.

10.     Regarding retrenchment, employers in Malaysia have a responsibility to not only ensure that the compensation offered complies with the Employment (Termination and Lay-off Benefits) Regulations 1980 but also to take various measures into account before implementing such layoffs.

.

11.     We will explain this in our next article. If you have any further inquiries or require additional assistance on this matter, please feel free to contact us: https://wa.link/q3kmv5

.

Like & Follow our Facebook Page to get more legal information.

.

You can learn other legal information from our website:https://www.yeolaw.my/

.

#YeoLawChambers #YLC #employmentdispute #labourlaw #employmentagreement #Bandardatoonn #法律 #杨律师事务所 #劳工纠纷 #劳工合同 #劳工法 #新山律师

马来西亚最低退休年龄

杨律师你好,我有关于退休的问题想要询问你。在三十年前,我跟几个朋友成立了一间做棕油出口公司。如今已经有了一定的规模,每一年都有不错的收入。我也是这间公司的其中一个director。可是就在上个月,我们的大股东突然建议我退休,理由是我已经57岁了表现没有以前那么好。我想请问你马来西亚有法定的退休年龄吗?如果公司这里还是坚持要我退休,请问我可以采取什么行动?在我退休后,我有权跟公司拿一笔退休金吗?

马来西亚法定假期

问题: . “杨律师你好,我有员工假期的问题想要询问你。一直以来我公司的policy是比较随便的,只要是公共假期我们都会给员工有薪假期。如果当天有特别需要上班,我们都会按照劳工法支付双倍日薪给员工。” . “但是最近我注意到马来西亚2023年的公共假期真的很多!! 加上政府时不时给惊喜宣布特别假期,员工也会申请年假病假等等。我发现这一年我们公司给了员工很多有薪假…” . “我听说其实根据法律,员工每一年享有的有薪公共假期只有11天而已: 其中5天为强制公共假期,加上我们雇主自己选的剩下6天,其它假期我们都不需要给薪金对吗??” . “如果是这样政府突然宣布的特别假期有没有包在里面呢?我需要怎样通知我的员工公司选择的有薪假??希望你回答我的问题,谢谢。” . 答案: ....

兼职员工法律

Intro: . “杨律师你好,我是一名本地知名奶茶连锁店的老板。最近因为学校假期的关系,我打算多聘请几位兼职员工做part time来应付这一两个星期比较多的顾客。” . “我想请问如果是聘请兼职员工,根据本地的劳工法律,有没有规定我必须要准备雇佣合同给他们签呢?因为现在我的公司只跟全职员工签合同而已。。。” . “另外,请问本地有没有特别的法律规定兼职员工最低福利是多少呢?如果抵触的话,我的兼职员工可不可以投诉我?会不会有任何刑罚?” . 在聘请兼职员工时,许多本地的雇主常常会忽略保护兼职员工的法律以及政府规定的最低福利。因此在这一期的文章里,我们将会解释雇主政府为聘请兼职员工制定的相关法律。 . 答案: . 根据马来西亚的Employment...

2022年劳工法修正案

“杨律师你好,最近我听说政府将会落实新的法案修改马来西亚的劳工法令。” . “我也听说这个最新的劳工法令会在2023年1月1号实施,主要会有10个重大改变。” . “请问这个2022年的修正案跟2021年刚落实的修正案有什么分别? 能够一起向我讲解吗?简短讲重点就好。“ . 随着人力资源部宣布马来西亚将在于2023年1月1号落实新的劳工修正法令(Employment (Amendment) Act 2022),我们最近也收到了许多针对该新法案的询问以及需不需修改雇佣合同的相关咨询。 . 在这今天的法律文章里,我们会一次过讲解2021以及2022两个劳工修正法案带来的改变:- ....