Yeo Law Chambers

Legal Articles

What should I do if I’ve received a letter of demand from a lawyer?

Intro:

.

In this modern era when legal services are getting more and more accessible, it is very common for one to receive a ‘Letter of demand’ whenever there is a dispute arises.

.

Hence, today we going to share about 3 frequently asked questions about receiving a letter of demand in our article:

.

  • Whether receiving a notice of demand means that the matter has been brought before the Court and the receiver has been sued?
    .
  • What the receiver should pay attention to after receiving a letter of demand?

.

  • What are the legal consequences of ignoring a letter of demand?

.

Question 1: Whether receiving a notice of demand means that the receiver has been sued?

.

This is actually one of the common misconceptions. A letter of demand itself is not a court document but in essence, a letter demanding a potential litigant to do or not to do a thing within a specified period of time so as to avoid litigation in the future.

.

For example, a letter demanding a debtor to make payment within 7 days after receiving the letter of demand (debt-related matters); or a letter demanding the maker to delete his defamatory post published on Facebook immediately (for defamation action).

.

In some cases, the purpose of a lawyer’s letter is not really to ask another party to do a certain act. Rather, it is to clarify legal position so that the client of the issuing firm could rely on a particular legal defense when the matter goes to the Court in the future.

.

Therefore, when one receives a letter of demand, it does not necessarily mean that he/she has been sued, unless the letter itself also informs the receiving party that a court action has been filed enclosing the supporting court documents.
.

Question 2: What the receiver should pay attention to after receiving a letter of demand?

.

Basically, other than the terms of demand (against the receiving party), a letter of demand itself will also illustrate how the legal dispute arises (with chronology of events) and the allegations against the receiver.

.

Therefore, after receiving the letter of demand, the receiver not only need to pay attention to the deadline in replying the letter, he also needs to pay attention to the contents of all the allegations made against him, and whether these allegations are wrong.

.

If the allegations stipulated therein are inconsistent with what have actually happened between the parties or in conflict with the written documents involved, then it is advisable for the receiver to engage a lawyer immediately to formally reply, deny, correct, and/or clarify the receiver’s position through a reply letter.

.

In addition, if the receiving party feels that the request made by the issuing party in the letter of demand is unreasonable, it is advisable for the receiving party to engage a lawyer to seek legal advice as to whether such demand adhering to legal principles applicable.

.

Question 3: What are the legal consequences of ignoring a letter of demand?

.

In many cases, the Defendants have ignored the letters of demands received, without knowing that such behaviors could have adversely affected or compromised their cases in the subsequent lawsuits.

.

It should be noted that although ignoring a letter of demand does not mean the receiving party admitting his liability, however, when the matter is being brought to the Court later, the Court would still consider the receiver’s act in ignoring the letter as a relevant fact to determine whether the other party is liable or not (Section 8 of the Evidence Act 1950).

.

If the litigant is a businessman, the fact that he has failed to reply to a letter of demand issued could be a very disadvantageous factor because according to the decided cases, a businessman who receives a letter of demand ought to answer it if he means to dispute the facts as alleged in the letter.

.

In the case of Small Medium Enterprise Development Bank Malaysia (formerly known as Bank Perusahaan Kecil dan Sederhana Malaysia Bhd) v. Lim Woon Katt, the court has actually allowed the Plaintiff’s Summary Judgment application after considered the fact that the defendant did not reply to the letter of demand issued by the Plaintiff’s solicitors.

.

Therefore, after receiving a letter of demand, the best way is to find a lawyer to seek for consultation.

.

These are the information regarding letter of demand that we would want to share with you today. If you have any inquiries about litigation matter, please do contact us::https://wa.link/q3kmv5

.

****If you want to know about the steps to be taken before initiating debt recovery action, you can read our article.

.

****About the frequently asked question for debt recovery action, you can read our article.

.

****

About validity of friendly loan between friends and relatives, you can read our article.

.

Like & Follow our Facebook Page to get more legal information.

.

You can learn other legal information from our website:https://www.yeolaw.my/

.

#YeoLawChambers #YLC #letterofdemand #law #JBlawfirm #Bandardatoonn #debtrecovery #litigation #letterofdemand #settlement

.

#法律 #杨律师事务所 #律师信 #新山律师 #债务问题 #诉讼

马来西亚诉讼时效

杨律师你好,我有一个关于诉讼期限的问题想要询问你。我在几个月前接手了我父亲的批发生意。之后我发现有几个顾客长期拖欠款项,其中一些客户已经欠公司钱超过7年了。我听我的朋友说过在马来西亚,一个官司的诉讼时效是6年而已。因此我想了解是否意味着我父亲的公司已经无法向这些客户追讨债务了?在什么情况下,诉讼时效期限可以被延呢?

发展商迟交屋不维修,该怎么办?

杨律师您好,五年前我购买了一间双层排屋。根据购房合同,发展商必须在24个月内完成房屋并交付钥匙给我。之后发展商就一直以资金短为由推迟工程进度直到3个月前我才拿到钥匙。我之后发现屋子很多问题,发展商也拒绝维修,请问我们该怎么办

追讨债务的诉讼期限

. 问题: . “杨律师您好,我是一位商人,有一名客户欠了我一笔钱大概整整8年了。” . “尽管每一年我不断地尝试追讨,但是对方总是以各种理由拖延,目前欠款加上利息已经达到了RM300k!” . “我有听朋友说我的这笔债现在是没有办法追回来了,因为已经过了诉讼的期限。此外,我也听说我每月向客户征收5%的逾期利息(late payment interest)可能是非法的,因为数目太高也没有得到对方的同意。” . “请问遇到这样的情况我应该如何应对?诉讼期限有办法延长吗?请你给我相关的意见 谢谢!” ....